Legal Opinion
Skinner v. DME CORPORATION
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided April 5, 1983No. Docket 60762PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtD. F. Walsh, J.
Third-party plaintiffs, D-M-E Corporation and VSI Corporation (hereinafter collectively designated "D-M-E”), appeal the circuit court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of third-party defendant, American Model & Pattern, Inc, (hereinafter "American”). GCR 1963, 117.2(1).
D-M-E sold American a mold sampler, a device used to inject hot, molten wax under pressure into various molds. Plaintiff Randy Skinner, an employee of American, was severely injured when, while he was operating the mold sampler, the machine exploded. Plaintiffs filed suit against D-ME, alleging negligence and breach of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Piercefield v. Remington Arms Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Smith v. E R Squibb & Sons, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Dale v. WhitemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Hill v. Sullivan Equipment Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Langley v. Harris Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Rosado v. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Latimer v. William Mueller & Son, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Paul v. BogleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Cliffs Forest Products Co. v. Al Disdero Lumber Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Rittenhouse v. ErhartMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.