Legal Opinion

Abram v. Art Goebel Ford

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 17, 1982No. 82-636PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

The employer and its insurer last on the risk seek review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals awarding workers’ compensation benefits to the employee. We affirm the findings as to when disablement occurred and that the employee’s occupational disease constitutes a' work-related injury, but we reverse and remand for an essential finding of fact as to whether the employee’s work during the last insurer’s coverage was a substantial contributing factor to his disability.

Ervin L. Abram, the employee, claimed a disablement and personal injury by reason of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. Busse v. Quality Insulation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Notch v. Victory Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Moes v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Polaschek v. Asbestos Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Flowers v. Consolidated Container Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Radermecher v. FMC Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API