Legal Opinion

Schnurrer v. Hoerner-Waldorf

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 24, 1984No. Nos. C0-83-563, C2-83-564PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KELLEY, Justice.

The Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals (WCCA) held that the employee had not proved Gillette-type injuries to his knee and back and vacated findings of a compensation judge concerning temporary total and permanent partial disabilities and their apportionment between insurers. We conclude the evidence as a whole does not support this conclusion and, therefore, reverse.

Employee worked as a paper baler for Hoerner-Waldorf beginning in 1947. The work required him to stand constantly on a cement floor, to climb up and down steps from 50 to 100 times each shift, to bend and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Talmage v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Carlson v. Flour City Brush Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Guggenberger v. Cold Spring Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Anderson v. Frontier CommunicationsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API