Legal Opinion

Reichert v. Pa. R.R. Co. (Et Al.)

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 1944No. Appeal, 8PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

This appeal is by the Commonwealth from a judgment entered against it upon an award under the Pennsylvania Occupational Disease Act of 1939, P. L. 566. The case reveals some unusual circumstances and presents some close and interesting legal questions.

The occupational disease involved is lead poisoning— section 108(a).

The Act of 1939, as well as its predecessor of July 2, 1937, P. L. 2714, makes a clear distinction between disability resulting from occupational diseases which developed to the point of disablement only after an exposure of five or more years, and those…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Guy v. Stoecklein Baking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Byrne v. Henry A. Hitner's Sons Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Creighton v. Continental Roll & Steel Foundry Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Ratto v. Pennsylvania Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Healey v. Carey, Baxter & Kennedy, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. American Casualty Co. v. KLIGERMANSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Harrington v. Mayflower Manufacturing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Ochoa v. Union Camp Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
  4. Commonwealth, Bureau of Occupational Injury & Disease Compensation v. BrownCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Ciabattoni v. Birdsboro Steel Foundry & Machine Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API