Legal Opinion
Guy v. Stoecklein Baking Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 18, 1938No. Appeal, 121PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Parker, J.,
On January 10, 1934, Russell A. Guy met with an accident while in the course of his employment with Stoecklein Baking Company and was disabled as a result of injuries then sustained. The claim petition which initiated this action was not filed until May 20, 1935, more than sixteen months after the accident. The sole defense interposed and now relied upon was that the action was barred by reason of the fact that it was not started within one year after the accident as required by the statute under which the claim was made. Referee and board found for the claimant, holding…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Wise v. Cambridge Springs BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Harris v. MercurSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Martin v. Pittsburg Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Singer v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Prettyman v. IrwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Nesbitt v. Erie Coach Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Scarborough v. Atlantic Coast Line R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- Gee v. CBS, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Board of Finance & Revenue of CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Elsea v. Broome Furniture Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.