Legal Opinion

Healey v. Carey, Baxter & Kennedy, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 3, 1941No. Appeals, 25 and 33PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

Two separate proceedings were brought by claimant, one seeking to recover compensation from Carey Baxter & Kennedy, Inc., on whose mining operation the injury occurred, and the other against Yesu brothers, truckers, who were the immediate employers of claimant. Admitting that claimant lost the use of an eye in the course of his employment, each of these employers maintains that the other is liable for the payment of compensation. The referee and the board found the Carey company alone liable and made an award accordingly. The lower court on appeals, reversed in both cases…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sgattone v. Mulholland & Gotwals, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. McColligan v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  3. Simonton v. MortonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Ford v. A. E. Dick Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Thatcher v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Mature v. AngeloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Pennsylvania Smelting & Refining Co. v. DuffinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Hoffman v. Montgomery CountySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Sechrist v. Kurtz BrothersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Shields v. William Freihofer Baking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API