Legal Opinion

Ciabattoni v. Birdsboro Steel Foundry & Machine Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 1955No. Appeals, Nos. 239 and 250PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

Rinaldo Ciabattoni seeks compensation under the Pennsylvania Occupational Disease Act.1 On January 4, 1954, he filed a claim petition containing the following averment: “I became totally disabled as the result of silicosis on 22nd day of December 1952”. Answers were filed by the employer and by the State Workmen’s Insurance Board asserting that, since the action was not brought within one year from the date of disability, the claim was barred by the statute of limitations as set forth in section 315 of the Act.2 The referee made, inter alia, the following findings: “4.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Guy v. Stoecklein Baking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Agostin v. Pittsburgh Steel Foundry Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Rowles v. State Workmen's Insurance FundSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Jones v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. MacKanitz v. Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ciabattoni v. Birdsboro Steel Foundry & Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Commonwealth v. FoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Lowery v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Dumas v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API