State v. Hardison
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PeR Cueiam.
Defendant assigns as error the overruling of his motion for judgment of compulsory nonsuit as to both informations made at the close of the State’s evidence — the defendant offered no evidence. A careful study of the evidence presented by the State shows that it is sufficient to carry the case to the jury on both informations under the decisions of this Court. S. v. Coleman, 253 N.C. 799, 117 S.E. 2d 742; S. v. Cranfield, 238 N.C. 110, 76 S.E. 2d 353; S. v. Ridge, 125 N.C. 655, 34 S.E. 439; 37 C.J.S., Forgery, sec. 34. Defendant’s motion for judgment of compulsory nonsuit on both…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. CamelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State v. . CalcuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- State v. BraxtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State v. . GauseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- State v. StonestreetSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. WinfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. BlackshearCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. BooneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. WingoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978