State v. Stonestreet
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
First, we consider the conviction for resisting arrest as charged. While not argued in appellant’s brief, we are constrained to hold that the motion in arrest of judgment should have been allowed. If the offense is not sufficiently charged in the indictment, this Court, ex mero motu, will arrest the judgment. S. v. Thorne, 238 N.C. 392, 78 S.E. 2d 140; S. v. Watkins, 101 N.C. 702, 8 S.E. 346. The indictment is fatally defective in that it does not allege all the facts necessary to constitute an offense under G.S. 14-223. Specifically, it fails to charge the official duty the designated…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. CamelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State v. ColeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- State v. . CalcuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- State v. . WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. GreenleeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. BookerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- State v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- State v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.