Legal Opinion

State v. Blackshear

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 30, 1970No. 7012SC656PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MALLARD, Chief Judge.

Appellant’s brief does not comply with the provisions of Rule 28 of the Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals in that it does not contain, properly numbered, the several grounds of exception and assignment of error with reference to the pages1 of the record. Moreover, the assignments of error appearing in the record on appeal are inadequate because they are based on pages in the record instead of numbered exceptions. Assignments of error are ineffectual unless they are based on proper exceptions. Langley v. Langley, 268 N.C. 415, 150 S.E. 2d 764 (1966) ; Bost v. Bank,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. State v. McCoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. State v. CamelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. State v. . CalcuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  3. State v. StewartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. ButcherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API