State v. Wingo
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
We agree with defendant’s position that the trial judge failed to properly instruct the jury on the elements of kidnapping. The jury was instructed that kidnapping was the “taking and carrying away without lawful authority of a human being by force, threat of force, or fraud.”
Defendant was charged in an indictment with kidnapping which is a violation of G.S. 14-39. G.S. 14-39 (effective 1 July 1975) provides: “Any person who shall unlawfully confine, restrain, or remove from one place to another, any person 16 years of age or over without the consent of such person, or any other…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. HairrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State v. SuttonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State v. BlackshearCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. HardisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. BooneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977