Legal Opinion

Matter of R.S.S.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1991No. 17174PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

R.S.S. (defendant),1 a twelve-year old girl, challenges the admissibility of hearsay and prior bad act evidence and sufficiency of the evidence to sustain her adjudication as a delinquent.

Facts

Mother and father, parents of four-year daughter S.H., planned to attend a dance Saturday night, August 5, 1989, but found none of their regular babysitters available. On the recommendation of mother's friend, they hired defendant, who had recently moved into the area.

Mother…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. RufenerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. In re N. J. W.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. McCaffertySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. BaskerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. ReutterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. DaviSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. HerrmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Bloom v. BloomSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. CondonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Fritzmeier v. Krause Gentle Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API