Majors v. Girdner
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County, and from an order denying a new trial. Em-met Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The action is on a promissory note for the sum of $350, which, it is alleged, was made and delivered by the defendant to the Pacific Coast Securities Company, a corporation (for brevity to be hereinafter referred to as “the corporation”), and after such execution and delivery, assigned by the original payee to the plaintiff, “who is now the lawful owner and holder thereof.”
The answer admits the execution and delivery of the note as alleged in the complaint, but asserts that the instrument was procured from the defendant by the corporation above named through misrepresentation and fraud.
The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kelley v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Mitchell v. BeckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Johnson v. Dixon Farms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
- Mason v. LievreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by8 opinions
- Young v. New Pedrara Onyx Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- Lowe v. CopelandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Mindenberg v. Carmel Film Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Hardee v. Adams Oil Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Gallatin County Farmers' Alliance v. FlanneryMontana Supreme Court · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.