Legal Opinion

Young v. New Pedrara Onyx Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1920No. Civ. 3011; Civ. 3053PublishedCited by 27 opinions

APPEALS from judgments of the Superior Court of San Diego County. C. N. Andrews, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

Plaintiffs stockholders of the New Pedrara Mexican Onyx Company (hereafter referred to as the California company), suing on behalf of that corporation, brought this action to set aside a certain resolution adopted by the Compaq’s board of directors on June 27, 1911, whereby, so it is claimed, the board rescinded a transfer to the company of certain shares of the capital stock of another corporation, hereafter, for convenience, referred to as the Mexican Company. There are two appeals, each upon a separate record. Both appeals are from judgments in the same case.

These two appeals were decided…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Grymes v. . HoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Baldwin v. CanfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  3. The Elgee Cotton CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Lipscomb's Adm'r v. CondonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Northwestern Portland Cement Co. v. Atlantic Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1917

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Shapiro v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Robbins v. Pacific Eastern Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Grant v. LongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Kirkpatrick v. Tapo Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API