Teledyne Ryan Aeronautical Co. v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WINNER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Teledyne, initially filed a five count complaint against the single defendant, Montgomery Ward & Co. One Count of that complaint claimed patent infringement of a patent of an oral hygiene apparatus. This patent is commonly referred to as the Mattingly patent. Thereafter, Northern Electric Company filed a declaratory judgment action in California against Teledyne Industries, Inc., seeking to have the Mat-tingly patent declared to be invalid. Some two weeks later, Teledyne filed an amended complaint claiming patent infringement of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Scophony Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Schnell v. Peter Eckrich & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Steinway v. Majestic Amusement Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Engineered Sports Products v. Brunswick Corp.District Court, D. Utah · 1973
- L. D. Schreiber Cheese Co. v. Clearfield Cheese Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Penntube Plastics Company v. Fluorotex, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1971
- Shapiro v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1973