Legal Opinion

Teledyne Ryan Aeronautical Co. v. Montgomery Ward & Co.

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided April 29, 1971No. Civ. A. No. C-2405PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WINNER, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Teledyne, initially filed a five count complaint against the single defendant, Montgomery Ward & Co. One Count of that complaint claimed patent infringement of a patent of an oral hygiene apparatus. This patent is commonly referred to as the Mattingly patent. Thereafter, Northern Electric Company filed a declaratory judgment action in California against Teledyne Industries, Inc., seeking to have the Mat-tingly patent declared to be invalid. Some two weeks later, Teledyne filed an amended complaint claiming patent infringement of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United States v. Scophony Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Schnell v. Peter Eckrich & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Steinway v. Majestic Amusement Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Engineered Sports Products v. Brunswick Corp.District Court, D. Utah · 1973
  2. L. D. Schreiber Cheese Co. v. Clearfield Cheese Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Penntube Plastics Company v. Fluorotex, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1971
  4. Shapiro v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API