Legal Opinion
Engineered Sports Products v. Brunswick Corp.
District Court, D. Utah
Decided June 12, 1973No. C 316-72PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ALDON J. ANDERSON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs claim infringement of their United States Letters Patent No. 3,581,412 entitled, “Inner Boot and Method for Forming the Same.” The patent describes an inner boot or bladder which may be inserted into a ski boot and a process by which the inner boot may be custom fitted to the foot by the injection of a foam or other molding substance between its pliable interior and exterior linings. Joined by the complaint in a class as defendants are ski boot manufacturers, distributors and local retailers. The named alien defendants (hereinafter…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lauritzen v. LarsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Arthur H. Aftanase v. Economy Baler Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Beverly Hills Fan Company v. Royal Sovereign Corp. And Ultec Enterprises Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Chrysler Corp. v. Fedders Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Max Daetwyler Corp., a New York Corporation v. R. Meyer, a West German Corporation. Appeal of Rolf MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Honeywell, Inc. v. Metz ApparatewerkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.