Legal Opinion

Astleford v. SAIF Corp.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1994No. WCB 90-18739, 90-19654; CA A75105; SC S40854PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.

The question in this workers’ compensation case is whether, under ORS 656.289(4) (set out in full below), an employer who has not complied with the provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Law, ORS chapter 656, is a “party” who “may * * * by agreement” settle a disputed workers’ compensation claim. We answer that question “yes.”

In September 1988, claimant injured his left shoulder. He filed a workers’ compensation claim. In December 1988, the Department of Insurance and Finance (DIF) entered a proposed order, pursuant to ORS 656.052(2), declaring that claimant’s employer, Ronald Astleford…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Stephens v. BohlmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. SAIF Corp. v. StephenOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Astleford v. Saif Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Errand v. Cascade Steel Rolling Mills, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Saif Corp. v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. D. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. James v. ReconTrust Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2012
  5. Necanicum Investment Co. v. Employment DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API