Legal Opinion

Errand v. Cascade Steel Rolling Mills, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1995No. CC CV91283; CA A80487; SC S41195PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*512VAN HOOMISSEN, J.

Plaintiff filed a complaint in circuit court against defendant, his employer, alleging statutory and common law negligence claims and seeking damages for economic losses, past and future medical bills, lost wages, and impairment of earning capacity. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that defendant is immune from liability and that plaintiffs exclusive remedy is under the Workers’ Compensation Law. ORS 656.018.1 The Court of Appeals affirmed. Errand v. Cascade Steel Rolling Mills, Inc., 126 Or App 450, 454-55, 869 P2d 358 (1994). For…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Hale v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Stephens v. BohlmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. McGarrah v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Dethlefs v. Hyster Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Smothers v. Gresham Transfer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. GuzekOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. O'REGAN v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  5. Stratemeyer v. Lincoln CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1996

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API