Legal Opinion
James v. ReconTrust Co.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided February 29, 2012No. Case No. 3:11-cv-00324-STPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SIMON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In the summer of 2007, Plaintiffs Douglas A. James and Eileen M. James (“Plaintiffs”) obtained a loan, secured by a trust deed, to purchase their home in Clackamas County, Oregon. When Plaintiffs defaulted on their loan three years later, Defendants ReconTrust Company (“RTC”), BAC Home Loan Servicing L.P. (“BACHLS”), and Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc. (“MERS”) began the non-judicial foreclosure process set forth in the Oregon Trust Deed Act (“ODTA”), Or. Rev. Stat. (“ORS”) § 86.705, et seq. Plaintiffs filed suit in state…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brandrup v. Recontrust Co., N.A.Oregon Supreme Court · 2013
- Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Carlton J. DittoTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
- Niday v. GMAC Mortgage, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Higley v. Flagstar Bank, FSBDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
- Roisland v. Flagstar Bank, FSBDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.