Legal Opinion

Mayberry v. . Grimsley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 20, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Plaintiff’s action is grounded on tbe principle, settled by numerous decisions, that a conveyance or devise to “Nonnie and ber children” vests in Nonnie and ber children then living, including any in ventre sa mere, as tenants in common, tbe present estate conveyed or devised. Tate v. Amos, 197 N. C., 159, 147 S. E., 809; Cunningham v. Worthington, 196 N. C., 778, 147 S. E., 294; Snowden v. Snowden, 187 N. C., 539, 122 S. E., 300; Benbury v. Butts, 184 N. C., 23, 113 S. E., 499; Cullens v. Cullens, 161 N. C., 344, 77 S. E., 228.

Tbe defendants, on tbe other band, say tbe doctrine announced in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Triplett v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Cullens v. . CullensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Boyd v. . CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Benbury v. . ButtsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Tate v. . AmosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Griffin v. SpringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Kennedy v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Dull v. DullSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Powell v. RobersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Whitley v. ArensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API