Kennedy v. Kennedy
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtYaleNtiNB, J.
Does the language appearing at the end of the description in each of the three deeds under which Hobart A. Kennedy took title to the lands in question have the effect of creating life estates in the grantors named in said deeds? This question must be answered in the negative.
The recent case of Artis v. Artis, 228 N.C. 754, 47 S.E. 2d 228, furnishes abundant authority for the position here taken.
In the deeds now under consideration, the words of the granting clause, the habendum clause, and the warranty are clear and unambiguous and are fully sufficient to pass immediately a fee simple title…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bryant v. . ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Artis v. . ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Bryant v. ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Whitley v. ArensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Wilkins v. NormanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Cleveland Realty Company v. HobbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Oxendine v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Jeffries v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Lackey v. Hamlet City Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.