Legal Opinion · Dissent

Whitley v. Arenson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 31, 1941Published

1DissentClaeksoN, J.

The only material exception and assignment of error to be considered: Did the court below err in signing the judgment set out in the record? I think so.

N. C. Code, 1939 (Miehie), sec. 1739, is as follows: “‘Heirs’ construed ‘children’ in certain limitations. — A limitation by deed, will, or other writing, to the heirs of a living person, shall he construed to be the children of such person, unless a contrary intention appear by the deed or will.”

It seems that the main object of the section is to convert a contingent into a vested remainder under .certain circumstances. It seems also to have…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Triplett v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Heyer v. . BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Starnes v. . HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  4. Gudger v. White.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. May v. Lewis.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API