Dull v. Dull
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNy, J.
In the interpretation of a deed, the intention of the grantor must be gathered from the four corners of the instrument and every part thereof given effect, unless it contains conflicting provisions which are irreconcilable, or a provision which is contrary to public policy or runs counter to some rule of law. Ellis v. Barnes, 231 N.C. 543, 57 S.E. 2d 772; Edgerton v. Harrison, 230 N.C. 158, 52 S.E. 2d 357; Boyd v. Campbell, 192 N.C. 398, 135 S.E. 121; Willis v. Trust Co., 183 N.C. 267, 111 S.E. 163; Springs v. Hopkins, 171 N.C. 486, 88 S.E. 774.
The plaintiffs are relying upon the case of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Willis v. Mutual Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Boyd v. . CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Springs v. HopkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Ingram v. . EasleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Griffin v. SpringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Lackey v. Hamlet City Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Williams v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Quevedo v. DeansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- BEVIRT v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.