Kalfountzos v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NICHOLSON, Acting P. J.
A subcontractor on a public works project sued the general contractor for money claimed due. The subcontractor also sued the surety on the contractor’s payment- and stop-notice release bonds. At trial, the subcontractor asserted the surety could not raise the contractor’s defenses and setoffs because the contractor was in corporate suspense because of nonpayment of franchise fees and could not defend itself in court. We affirm the trial court’s judgment in favor of the surety. A surety, under these circumstances, can assert defenses and setoffs to the underlying…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- United States Leasing Corp. v. duPontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Flickinger v. Swedlow Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Glens Falls Insurance Company v. Murray Plumbing and Heating Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
3Cited by6 opinions
- Reliance Insurance Company v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Wm. R. Clarke Corp. v. Safeco Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Linkway Investment Co. v. Olsen (In Re Casamont Investors, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Cadle Co. v. World Wide Hospitality Furniture, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Royster Construction Co. v. Urban West CommunitiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.