Legal Opinion

Wm. R. Clarke Corp. v. Safeco Insurance of America

California Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1997No. S050148PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

In recent years, general contractors in California have begun to insert “pay if paid” provisions into their agreements with subcontractors. A pay if paid provision makes payment by the owner to the general contractor a condition precedent1 to the general contractor’s obligation to pay the subcontractor for work the subcontractor has performed.

In other jurisdictions, the majority view is that, if reasonably possible, clauses in construction subcontracts stating that the subcontractor will be paid when the general contractor is paid will not be construed as establishing true…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Hutnick v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Connolly Development, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Platt Pacific, Inc. v. AndelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. OBS Co., Inc. v. Pace Const. Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Welsbach Elec v. Mastec N. AmNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Superior Steel, Inc. v. Ascent at Roebling's Bridge, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. MidAmerica Construction Management, Inc. v. MasTec North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  4. Lehrer McGovern Bovis, Inc. v. Bullock Insulation, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2008
  5. United Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. Coast Iron & Steel Co.California Supreme Court · 2018

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API