Legal Opinion
Jerremy Dyer v. Ventra Sandusky
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 8, 2019No. 18-3802PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MERRITT, Circuit Judge.
In this Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) interference suit, 29 U.S.C. § 2615 (a)(1), plaintiff Jerremy Dyer seeks damages against his former employer, defendant Ventra Sandusky, LLC, for terminating him under defendant's no-fault attendance policy. The district court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment. Dyer v. Ventra Sandusky, L.L.C. , 317 F. Supp. 3d 953 (N.D. Ohio 2018). For the following reasons, we reverse the judgment of the district court and remand for further proceedings.
I
Defendant Ventra Sandusky is an automotive supplier with a manufacturing…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Seeger v. Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Penny Bachelder Mark Bachelder v. America West Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Bryson v. Regis Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Demyanovich v. Cadon Plating & Coatings, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Anderson v. Greater Dayton Regional Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
- BNSF Railway Company v. International Association of Sheet Metal Air Rail and Transportation WorkersDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2022
- Benick v. Morrow County Health DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- CONNALLY v. United States Department of Veteran AffairsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
- Clement v. Surgical Clinic, P.L.L.C., TheDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.