Legal Opinion

United States v. Am. Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa.

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 24, 2015No. Consol. 10-00119PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge:

Plaintiff, United States Customs and Border Protection, (“Customs”) brought this action to recover civil penalties against Defendant, Rupari Food Services Inc., (“Rupari” or “Defendant”) 1 for violations of Section 592 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. § 1592(a)(2012) 2 , and Defendant American Casualty Co. of Reading Pennsylvania, (“American Casualty”) to recover, under bonds, unpaid customs duties. Ru-pari moves for dismissal of this action, post-answer, on the grounds that the Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Exergen Corp. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  5. Bank of Guam v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. International Trading Services, LLCUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
  2. United States v. Univar USA, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2016
  3. United States v. Rupari Food Services, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2017
  4. United States‚ v. Rupari Food Services‚ Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2018
  5. Under the Weather, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API