Legal Opinion
Mark v. Westlin
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 6, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, District Judge.
The pertinent facts are as follows:
The defendant is the receiver of the First and Moorhead National Bank, having been appointed to succeed B. C. Schram, who was first appointed by the Comptroller of the Currency after the bank was closed on December 22, 1928.
The plaintiff, on December 21, 1928, had on deposit in the bank $2,559.71. She then arranged with the assistant cashier of the bank to purchase for her $2,500 of Liberty bonds of the United States, and gave to him a withdrawal slip upon her savings account for $2,534.46, the amount which he estimated would pay for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Empire State Surety Co. v. Carroll CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Frelinghuysen v. NugentU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1888
- Beard v. Independent Dist. of Pella CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- Larabee Flour Mills v. First Nat. Bank of HenryettaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Farmers' Nat. Bank of Burlington v. PribbleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kershaw v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- City of Lincoln v. RickettsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Converse Rubber Co. v. Boston-Continental Nat. BankDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1935
- Connolly v. LangCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
- Larabee Flour Mills Co. v. First Nat. Bank of DublinDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.