Legal Opinion
Converse Rubber Co. v. Boston-Continental Nat. Bank
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 20, 1935No. 3682PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREWSTER, District Judge.
This suit in equity was originally brought against the Boston-Continental National Bank and its receiver.
The matter is before the court upon an amended bill of complaint, in which the Federal Reserve Bank is joined as a party defendant.
Plaintiff seeks to establish a trust upon the assets in the hands of the receiver in the amount of $50,000 with accrued interest, and prays for a decree declaring that the Federal Reserve Bank holds the said amount for the benefit of the plaintiff, and that it be ordered to pay it over to the plaintiff.
Statement of Facts.
1. The…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Farmers & Merchants Bank of Monroe v. Federal Reserve Bank of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. PottorffSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Commercial Bank of Pa. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Bank of the Republic v. MillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Schuyler v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Mademoiselle Of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Hibernia National Bank v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1983
- Seattle-First National Bank v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1985
- Bryant v. Linn CountyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.