Legal Opinion
Connolly v. Lang
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 19, 1933No. 4949PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPARKS, Circuit Judge.
Appellee brought this action against appellant and the bank for which he was receiver, to establish a preferred claim in the amount of $8,500. The amount of the claim is not controverted. The court, under Equity Rule 70% (28 USCA § 723), found the facts specially, and in substance they are as follows: Jackson Park National Bank of Chicago, which is hereinafter referred to as the Bank, was a national bank doing business in Chicago on June 22,1932. Prior to that date, appellee had opened a savings account with the Bank, and on June 22, 1932, there were credits in her favor…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schuyler v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Blakey v. BrinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Beard v. Independent Dist. of Pella CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- In re BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
- Hirning v. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minn.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- John L. Walker Co. v. AldenDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1934
- Hanna v. Consolidated School Dist. No. 1 of Henry CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. SullivanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- American Surety Co. v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Scully v. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.