Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 25, 1928No. Docket No. 5976PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

There is pending in respondent court an action wherein Max B. Jamison, Lloyd J. Killian and others are plaintiffs and Jesse Alexander and others are defendants. The plaintiffs therein, desiring to procure the issuance of a writ of attachment, made application to respondent clerk therefor, and among other things submitted to him a so-called undertaking, on attachment, but signed only by Jamison and Killian. The body of this paper, after stating the conditions of the obligation it was intended to evidence, concludes: “In testimony whereof, the said sureties, and each of them,” have affixed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pacific Palisades Ass'n v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Dufton v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. GetchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  4. Russell v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. San Diego Wholesale Credit Men's Ass'n. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Demaree v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Bales v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. California State Board of PharmacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API