Legal Opinion

Bales v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1942No. L. A. 18338PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

— This is an application for a writ of mandate to compel the Superior Court of Los Angeles County to permit the petitioner to participate in a proceeding to determine heirship pending in that court in the matter of the estate of Michael F. O’Dea, deceased. On several prior occasions controversial issues respecting the status and rights of claimants to this estate have been considered and adjudicated by this court, and for a full recital of the facts regarding the heirship proceeding generally, reference is made to the previous opinions rendered. (Estate of O’Dea, 15 Cal.2d 637 [104 P.2d 368];…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Matter of FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Texas Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Smith v. WesterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. In Re Estate of DolbeerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Morrison v. LandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Mannheim v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Estate of Axcelrod v. PockerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Estate of WiseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Veterans' Industries, Inc. v. LynchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Buker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API