A. Zerkowitz & Co., Inc. v. The United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Judge.
This appeal is from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, Second Division, Appellate Term '(one judge dissenting in part), 62 Cust.Ct. 986 and 297 F.Supp. 350 (A.R.D. 250), affirming the judgment of a single judge sitting in reappraisement, 55 Cust.Ct. 643 (R.D. 11095)'. The imported goods are tennis shoes imported from Japan during the years 1958, 1959, and 1960. Both at trial and on appeal they were held properly appraised on the basis of the American selling price, as defined in 19 U.S. C. § 1402(g), of tennis shoes manufactured by the United States Rubber Company…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mannesmann-Meer, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- The United States v. American Bitumuls & Asphalt Co., American Bitumuls & Asphalt Co. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Japan Import Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
- A. Zerkowitz & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- A. Zerkowitz & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- B & W Wholesale Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Concord Electronics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- Nichols & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- United States v. Josef Mfg., Ltd.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- United States v. Continental Forwarding Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.