Legal Opinion

Japan Import Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 2, 1936No. Customs Appeal 4007PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.

The appellant imported from Japan, under the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.A. § 1001 et seq.), at the port of New York, certain shoes with canvas tops and rubber soles, which were dutiable at 35 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1530 (e), § 1, of said Tariff Act (19 U.S.C.A. § 1001, par. 1530 (e). Appraisement was made of the shoes on the basis of American selling price, as provided in section 402 (g) of said Tariff Act (19 U.S.C.A. § 1402 (g), by virtue of the Proclamation of the President under the provisions of section 336 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.A. §…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Buttfield v. StranahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Diapulse Corporation of America v. Carba, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  2. United Shoe Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. Catherine Bedell, ChairmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  3. Madsen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  4. A. Zerkowitz & Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  5. United States v. Josef Mfg., Ltd.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API