Legal Opinion

A. Zerkowitz & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 15, 1962No. Reap. Dec. 10175; Reappraisements R60/20082, R59/18530, R60/16359, and R61/6166PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mollison, Judge:

On February 1, 1933, the President of the United States issued a proclamation, under the provisions of section 336 of the Tariff Act of 1930, changing the basis of value of imported footwear, the uppers of which are composed wholly or in chief value of certain textiles, with soles composed wholly or in chief value of india rubber, from the regular bases of value specified in section 402(c), (d), (e), and (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930 to the American selling price basis of valuation, as defined in section 402(g) of the said act. (63 Treas. Dec. 232, T.D. 46158.) At the times…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kuttroff v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  2. Hoyt v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. A. Zerkowitz & Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. A. Zerkowitz & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  3. E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API