Legal Opinion

United States v. Continental Forwarding Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided August 10, 1972No. 5415, C.A.D. 1063PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lane, Judge.

This is an appeal by the Government from the decision and judgment of the Appellate Term of the Customs Court, 64 Cust. Ct. 838, A.R.D. 270 (2d Div. 1970), holding the appraisement of certain binoculars imported from Japan to have been erroneous. It arises under essentially the same facts as United States v. Continental Forwarding, Inc., 53 CCPA 105, 106, C.A.D. 885 (1966), which Judge Smith, writing for this court, summarized as follows:

This appeal stems from an appeal to reappraisement in which the sole problem below was concerned with determining export values of the binoculars…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. A. Zerkowitz & Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  3. Continental Forwarding, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  4. Continental Forwarding, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  5. Continental Fwdg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Thomas Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Spanexico, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
  5. Philip J. Bernstein Enterprises v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API