Legal Opinion

A. Zerkowitz & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 5, 1969No. A.R.D. 250; Entry No. 961416, etcPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FoRD, Judge:

This is an. application for review of a decision and judgment of the trial court holding certain imported canvas-topped, rubber-soled footwear to be subject to appraisement on the basis of American selling price as defined in section 402a (g), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 91 Treas. Dec. 295, T.D. 54165. A. Zerkowitz & Co., Inc. v. United States, 55 Cust. Ct. 643, Reap. Dec. 11095.

The footwear the subject of the reappraisement appeals at bar which were consolidated for trial is of Japanese manufacture and origin, is composed of a cotton…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Japan Import Co.United States Customs Court · 1939
  2. A. Zerkowitz & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  3. Japan Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1938
  4. Mutual Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. A. Zerkowitz & Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. Concord Electronics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  3. Karl Schroff & Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  4. Converse Rubber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  5. Aldrich Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API