Legal Opinion

State v. Brannon

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 15, 1974No. 7421SC66PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARSON, Judge.

The defendant moved for a judgment as of nonsuit as to each count at the end of the State’s evidence and again at the end of all the evidence. We hold that the motion as to the charge of larceny of the Frazier dogs should have been allowed. The State contends that the defendant was in constructive possession of the Frazier dogs and that the doctrine of possession of recently stolen property would be sufficient to take the larceny charge to the jury. However, the facts do not support the constructive possession of the dogs by the defendant. The uncontradicted testimony showed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. State v. MacKSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  5. Hubbard v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. SinclairCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. SinclairCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API