Legal Opinion

State v. Stanley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 16, 1985No. 8422SC430PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

In his first two assignments of error defendant contends the trial court erred in denying his motions to dismiss at the close of the State’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence. When defendant elected to offer evidence after the denial of his motion to dismiss, he waived his motion to dismiss at the close of the State’s evidence. State v. Calloway, 305 N.C. 747, 291 S.E. 2d 622 (1982); G.S. 15-173. We will, therefore, only consider his motion to dismiss at the close of all the evidence. Upon defendant’s motion to dismiss, all the evidence favorable to the State must be…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. AhearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. CallowaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. BillupsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. MannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. RossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. MidyetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  5. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API