Legal Opinion

State v. Bartlett

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1985No. 8525SC246PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the denial by the trial court of his motion to dismiss the charges against him made at the close of the State’s evidence. Defendant was found not guilty of felonious larceny. Denial of the motion with respect to the charge of felonious possession of stolen property is the issue now before the court. Defendant contends that the State’s evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction and that the charge should not have been submitted to the jury. We agree.

In a motion to dismiss, the question presented is whether the evidence is sufficient to support…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. MacKSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. EppleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Matter of DulaneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. FrazierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. PlankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  2. State v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API