Brandt v. Thompson
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court:
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This action was tried upon the second amended complaint. What the preceding complaints were does not appear. The second amended complaint presents simply an action to quiet title. It is averred that plaintiff is, and for a long time has been, the owner in fee and in the actual possession of certain described land; that defendants claim and assert an interest of some kind in said land; and that defendants, or either of them, have no right, title, or interest whatever in said land. The prayer is, that defendants be required to set forth the nature of their asserted claims, and that it be…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Spect v. SpectCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Booth v. HoskinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Hall v. ArnottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Hughes v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- De Cazara v. OreñaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Faxon v. All PersonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Burns v. HiattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Trippet v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Tracy v. WheelerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
- Payne v. NeuvalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.