De Cazara v. Oreña
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County. The facts are stated in the -opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
This is a suit to quiet title. The complaint is in the usual form, unverified. The answer is a general denial of all the allegations of the complaint, except that defendant claims an interest in the property adverse to the plaintiff, followed by a plea of the statute of limitations.
The finding of the superior court was against 'the defendant as to his claim under the statute, but the court found as follows concerning the title:—
On January 16, 1877, the lot in controversy was the property of Bernarda Rodriguez, who on that day mortgaged it to the defendant, Greña, to secure the payment of her…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Booth v. HoskinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by20 opinions
- Faxon v. All PersonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Benson v. ShotwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Collins v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Denver, L. & G. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Tracy v. WheelerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.