Hall v. Arnott
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sierra County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Gibson, C.
Action to redeem from a mortgage in form of a deed absolute.
On the seventh day of August, 1882, one Charles Waterhouse became the owner of an undivided one-tenth interest in the Pacific Mining Claim, situated in the Port Wine district, in Sierra County, and in conjunction with N. B. Abbott and S. M. Boyce on the same date executed and delivered to James Arnott and Thomas Baird, who were mining partners at the time, a deed absolute in form, conveying said one-tenth interest in the Pacific Mining Claim to secure the payment of money due from Waterhouse to the grantees, the amount of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Biddel v. BrizzolaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Arrington v. LiscomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Booth v. HoskinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Raynor v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Mascarel v. RaffourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Walker v. Community BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Silvers v. GrossmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Martin v. BeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Collins v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Denver, L. & G. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.