State v. Howell
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
The state appeals a pretrial order suppressing evidence. The primary issue is whether the supporting affidavit contains sufficient facts to establish probable cause for issuance of certain search warrants. We conclude that the affidavit is sufficient and reverse.
The warrants were based on an affidavit by Detective Durbin, which sets out his training, experience and knowledge of indoor marijuana growing operations, as well as that of Detective Barbero, with whom Durbin conferred. It also includes information which came from several named informants and Durbin’s inquiries at the power company.
Du…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State v. VillagranOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. AnspachOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. TackerOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. PrinceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. GaleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. McBrideCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- State v. De La RosaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. CastroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.