Legal Opinion

State v. Gale

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 6, 1991No. 10-88-09736; CA A62296; 10-88-09742; CA A62302PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

In these consolidated criminal cases,1 the trial court granted defendants’ motions to suppress evidence on the ground that the facts alleged in the affidavit supporting the search warrant were too stale to establish probable cause. We reverse.

The warrant, issued on November 2,1988, was based on an affidavit by Officer Shadwick, in which he related information received by police from 1986 to 1988. The issue is whether the affidavit contained information sufficiently linking defendant Rowden to an ongoing methamphetamine manufacturing and distributing enterprise to enable a magistrate to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. State v. AnspachOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. IngramOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. PrinceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. State v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. CharlesworthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. State v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. State v. CastroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API