Legal Opinion

Obraske v. Woody

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 7, 1972No. 43177PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MacLaughlin, Justice.

Defendant property owners appeal from a judgment of the district court and an order denying a new trial in a mechanics lien case. The only question before this court is whether the trial court’s awards of attorneys’ fees to plaintiff, Gerald Obraske, and to intervenor, Bituminous Construction Company, were excessive.

The action involved foreclosure of a mechanics lien. At the trial plaintiff’s attorney, Donald K. Smith, testified to a rather lengthy list of services that he had performed for plaintiff in the case. In addition to the normal tasks of preparation of a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Living Trust Created by AtwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Hempel v. HempelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Schmoll v. LuchtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. Larson-Roberts Electric Co., Inc. v. BurdickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. Bierlein v. GagnonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Vandeputte v. SoderholmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. Hilltop Construction, Inc. v. Lou Park ApartmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. v. Bahr Construction, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  4. Kittler & Hedelson v. Sheehan Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. Asp v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API