Legal Opinion
Burke v. California Coastal Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 1, 2008No. B207188PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BOREN, P. J.
This case arises from the denial of a permit by respondent California Coastal Commission (the Coastal Commission) to replace an existing but deteriorating chain link fence, approximately 1,000 feet long, located on private property at the bottom of the bluffs at a Torrance beach. A 1988 boundary agreement with the State Lands Commission, other entities of the State of California (the State), the City of Torrance (the City), and affected homeowners specifically described the fence as an essential component of an agreed-upon boundary separating a sandy beach easement for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Yost v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Lewin v. St. Joseph Hospital of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Napa Valley Wine Train, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Halaco Engineering Co. v. South Central Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Defend Our Waterfront v. State Lands CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Hagopian v. St. of CACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Gualala Festivals Committee v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Citizens for a Better Eureka v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- City of Malibu v.California CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.