Legal Opinion
City of Malibu v.California Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 10, 2012No. B234353PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRIMES, J.
SUMMARY
In this case, we decide the California Coastal Commission (Coastal Commission) acted in excess of its jurisdiction when it approved amendments to a city’s certified local coastal program at the request of state agencies, over the objections of the city, where the amendments were not requested to undertake a public works project or energy facility development, but instead changed the city’s land use policies and development standards as they would apply to future plans for development within the city. Having found the Coastal Commission exceeded its authority by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Yost v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Agnew v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Burke v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Dana Point v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- San Diego Unified Port Dist. v. Cal. Coastal Comm'n, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- City of Dana Point v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Dana Point v. Cal. Coastal Com.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Lindstrom v. Cal. Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.