Legal Opinion
Halaco Engineering Co. v. South Central Coast Regional Commission
California Supreme Court
Decided July 10, 1986No. L.A. 32032PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRODIN, J.
In this administrative mandamus proceeding (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5) we review a judgment granting a peremptory writ of mandate.1 The writ commands the California Coastal Commission (Commission) and the South Central Coast Regional Commission (Regional Commission)2 to confirm a vested right in the Halaco Engineering Company *57(Halaco) to continue the use of a settling pond and waste disposal site on its property which is adjacent to the sand dunes of Ormand Beach in Ventura County, without obtaining a permit to do so from the Regional Commission. The property is located…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Morrison v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Hansen Brothers Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Kazensky v. City of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Goat Hill Tavern v. City of Costa MesaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- McAllister v. County of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Santos v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.