Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Wallace

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 30, 1998No. SCBD 4248PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice.

¶ 1 In this disciplinary proceeding against a lawyer, the issues to be decided are, (1) Does the record submitted for our examination provide sufficient evidence for a meaningful de novo consideration of the complaint’s disposition? 1 and (2) Is this respondent’s misconduct, which occurred while she was acting in the capacity of a trustee, subject to discipline under any of the provisions of the rules of professional ethics? We answer both questions in the affirmative.

¶2 The Oklahoma Bar Association (the “Bar”) commenced this disciplinary proceeding against Sherry T. Wallace…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. In Re Integration of State Bar of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. FarrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  3. Smith v. Baptist Foundation of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MayesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. McGeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API